Recently, the first round of meter reading after the implementation of the ladder price was over, did the new charging standard affect the residents' lives and what did the residents report? According to some urban users, “there was not much change†and “the calculation method is complicated, but the cost seems to be The difference is not," has become the most common voice. The discussions on the reform of electricity prices have re-entered the field of vision. How the ladder price of “potholes†benefits the people has become a topic of relish in all walks of life.
The ladder price is an important measure of electricity price reform and an important part of the reform of the power industry. Its key issues are worthy of our deep thinking. First, the relative price is too high. The cost of electricity consumed by residents in developed countries in the world accounts for 6.79% of the national average monthly wage. The figure in China is 30.68%, far exceeding the level of developed countries. China's electricity prices still have an overall downward adjustment. The so-called "China's electricity prices are much cheaper than European and American countries" is purely confusing.
Second, there is a lack of humane care. Taking the mature electricity market as an example, the United States is quite human when dividing peak electricity usage. The annual New Year's Day, World War II Anniversary Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day are all classified as “non-peak†periods. At the same time, medical equipment that has major diseases can apply for a fee reduction; the Korean government adopts electricity subsidy measures for elderly people and families with many children. However, there are few “caring mechanisms†in China’s ladder price, especially the preferential policies for subsidies for migrant workers and low-income families are not in place.
Again, lack of flexibility, no incentive mechanism. For example, Tokyo Electric Power Co., Ltd. launched a package of time-of-use electricity prices to encourage residents to stagger peak usage of electricity. In the United States, electricity discounts and time-shared energy prices encourage electricity conservation; Germany introduced a more flexible “electricity price packageâ€. However, China's "cold" power system lacks a flexible space. It is difficult to distinguish between rewards and punishments and it is difficult for residents to consciously save electricity. We should learn from the western developed countries, formulate more flexible ladder prices, and set up more programs to encourage people to save electricity.
In the end, punishment was not in place, and violations of laws and regulations persisted for a long time. In the process of implementing the ladder electricity price, the supervision and management of the power supervision department is not enough. The phenomenon of electricity theft occurs from time to time, and the landlord's arbitrary price increases abound. Ordinary people are deeply affected by it and have repeatedly reflected that the meter is "too sensitive." In particular, the payment of electricity bills paid by urban village users and low-income people in the “urban-rural integration department†is generally bullish. The pressure on the people’s lives is huge and their legitimate interests are impaired. Strictly and quickly punishing violations of laws and regulations is a matter of no delay.
Problems in the implementation of ladder electricity prices, cross-subsidy and other issues should be addressed. Due to the impact of the historical system, China’s long-standing system of cross-subsidized electricity tariffs for industrial subsidies, urban subsidies, and subsidies for residents has caused the pricing mechanism of electricity prices to be undisclosed and opaque, seriously undermining the legitimate interests of power generation companies and ordinary people, and impeding electricity. The overall process of industrial reform needs to be adjusted or repealed.
The ladder price is an important measure of electricity price reform and an important part of the reform of the power industry. Its key issues are worthy of our deep thinking. First, the relative price is too high. The cost of electricity consumed by residents in developed countries in the world accounts for 6.79% of the national average monthly wage. The figure in China is 30.68%, far exceeding the level of developed countries. China's electricity prices still have an overall downward adjustment. The so-called "China's electricity prices are much cheaper than European and American countries" is purely confusing.
Second, there is a lack of humane care. Taking the mature electricity market as an example, the United States is quite human when dividing peak electricity usage. The annual New Year's Day, World War II Anniversary Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day are all classified as “non-peak†periods. At the same time, medical equipment that has major diseases can apply for a fee reduction; the Korean government adopts electricity subsidy measures for elderly people and families with many children. However, there are few “caring mechanisms†in China’s ladder price, especially the preferential policies for subsidies for migrant workers and low-income families are not in place.
Again, lack of flexibility, no incentive mechanism. For example, Tokyo Electric Power Co., Ltd. launched a package of time-of-use electricity prices to encourage residents to stagger peak usage of electricity. In the United States, electricity discounts and time-shared energy prices encourage electricity conservation; Germany introduced a more flexible “electricity price packageâ€. However, China's "cold" power system lacks a flexible space. It is difficult to distinguish between rewards and punishments and it is difficult for residents to consciously save electricity. We should learn from the western developed countries, formulate more flexible ladder prices, and set up more programs to encourage people to save electricity.
In the end, punishment was not in place, and violations of laws and regulations persisted for a long time. In the process of implementing the ladder electricity price, the supervision and management of the power supervision department is not enough. The phenomenon of electricity theft occurs from time to time, and the landlord's arbitrary price increases abound. Ordinary people are deeply affected by it and have repeatedly reflected that the meter is "too sensitive." In particular, the payment of electricity bills paid by urban village users and low-income people in the “urban-rural integration department†is generally bullish. The pressure on the people’s lives is huge and their legitimate interests are impaired. Strictly and quickly punishing violations of laws and regulations is a matter of no delay.
Problems in the implementation of ladder electricity prices, cross-subsidy and other issues should be addressed. Due to the impact of the historical system, China’s long-standing system of cross-subsidized electricity tariffs for industrial subsidies, urban subsidies, and subsidies for residents has caused the pricing mechanism of electricity prices to be undisclosed and opaque, seriously undermining the legitimate interests of power generation companies and ordinary people, and impeding electricity. The overall process of industrial reform needs to be adjusted or repealed.
Surround Speakers,Wall Hanging Speakers,Home Theater Speakers,Ultra Thin Wall Hanging
The ASI Audio technology Co. LTD , https://www.asi-sound.com